validity and reliability of the turkish version of needs based biopsychosocial distress instrument for cancer patients (candi)

patients and methods the study was performed with the participation of 172 cancer patients aged 18 and over. factor analysis (principal components analysis) was used to assess construct validity. criterion validities were tested by computing spearman correlation between candi and hospital anxiety depression scale (hads), and brief symptom inventory (bsi) (convergent validity) and quality of life scales (fact-g) (divergent validity). test-retest reliabilities and internal consistencies were measured with intraclass correlation (icc) and cronbach-α. objectives the aim of this research was to determine the reliability and validity of the candi scale in the turkish language. conclusions candi is a valid and reliable scale in cancer patients with a three-factor structure (emotional, physical and social) in the turkish language. results a three-factor solution (emotional, physical and social) was found with factor analysis. internal reliability (α = 0.94) and test-retest reliability (icc = 0.87) were significantly high. correlations between candi and hads (rs = 0.67), and bsi (rs = 0.69) and fact-g (rs = -0.76) were moderate and significant in the expected direction. background needs based biopsychosocial distress instrument for cancer patients (candi) is a scale based on needs arising due to the effects of cancer.